Contracts and legal
Can a bankrupt company sell customer data?
Can a bankrupt company sell customer data? Often, but its old privacy promises follow the data into court, as RadioShack and 23andMe showed.
Updated
By the DataBroker team · 6 min read
The short answer
Yes, usually. Customer data is an asset a bankrupt company can sell. But if its privacy policy promised not to transfer personal information, US bankruptcy law blocks the sale unless it fits that policy or a court approves it after hearing from a consumer privacy ombudsman. Courts and regulators then attach conditions, such as binding the buyer to the old promises.
Why data ends up in bankruptcy sales at all
When a company fails, a court collects whatever it owns and sells it to pay creditors. Offices, servers and trademarks are obvious. Data is less obvious, but often worth more: a customer list, purchase histories, a codebase, years of support tickets or sensor readings. Buyers who would never have bought the whole business may bid for exactly that piece.
For a broker, these sales are worth understanding for two reasons. Closed and failing companies are some of the likeliest sellers of data, and the rules a bankruptcy court applies are a clear, public version of the questions any careful buyer asks in a private deal: who was promised what, and does the sale keep that promise?
What the law actually says
The rule sits in section 363(b)(1) of the US Bankruptcy Code. A trustee may sell the estate's property outside the ordinary course of business. There is one carve-out for data: if the company told individuals it would not transfer their personally identifiable information to unaffiliated parties, and that policy was in force when the case began, the trustee may not sell that information unless one of two things is true.
- The sale is consistent with the policy the customers were given.
- A consumer privacy ombudsman is appointed under section 332, there is notice and a hearing, and the court approves the sale after weighing the facts.
The ombudsman is a disinterested person appointed by the US trustee at least seven days before the hearing. They can tell the court about the company's privacy policy, what consumers stand to lose or gain, the costs and benefits to them, and alternatives that would reduce the harm. They must keep the personal information they see confidential.
What happened with RadioShack
RadioShack's 2015 bankruptcy is the case most people cite. Among the assets for auction were names, addresses, email addresses and purchase histories, and the FTC said documents suggested data on tens of millions of consumers might be included. RadioShack had told customers it would not sell their information.
On May 18, 2015, the FTC published a letter from Jessica Rich, then director of its Bureau of Consumer Protection, to the court's privacy ombudsman. Pointing back to the Toysmart bankruptcy of 2000, it asked for four conditions: that the data not be sold on its own but with other assets, that it go only to a buyer in substantially the same line of business, that the buyer be bound by the privacy policies in place when the data was collected, and that the buyer get affirmative consent before using the data in a materially different way.
What happened with 23andMe
The 2025 sale of 23andMe raised the stakes, because the data was genetic. A bankruptcy court approved a sale to TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit formed by co-founder Anne Wojcicki, for $305 million, after Regeneron had earlier agreed to buy the company for $256 million. The buyer committed to honour existing privacy policies and to let customers delete their accounts and data.
State attorneys general were involved throughout. Minnesota's attorney general later told consumers that the buyer must undergo annual independent external audits of its data safeguards and that people keep the right to delete their data permanently. The case showed that a court can approve a large data sale and still leave regulators pressing for conditions after it closes.
Which data faces which test
Section 363(b)(1) is about personally identifiable information covered by a no-transfer promise. Plenty of what a failed company holds is not that. Here is how the categories usually sort out.
| Kind of data | The bankruptcy test | Conditions seen in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Customer personal data, policy promised no transfer | Sale only if consistent with the policy, or approved after an ombudsman and a hearing | Sold with other assets, buyer in the same line of business, buyer bound by the old policy, consent before new uses |
| Customer personal data, policy allowed transfer in a sale | Ordinary sale rules, subject to state privacy laws | Regulators may still object, as state attorneys general did with 23andMe |
| Sensitive data such as genetic or health records | Same statute, plus state laws written for that kind of data | Deletion rights, audits, privacy advisory boards |
| Source code and internal documents with personal details removed | Ordinary sale of estate property | Licences inside the code, contracts with customers and partners, and confidentiality duties still apply |
| Data the company licensed from someone else | The licence decides whether it can be transferred at all | Often not sellable without the licensor's consent |
What a broker should take from this
- 1
Read the privacy policy that was live when the data was collected
Not just today's version. The promise in force at the time is the one that follows the data, in court and out of it.
- 2
Separate personal data from everything else
Codebases, de-identified records and business documents often move far more easily than customer files. Package them apart so one hard question doesn't stall the whole sale.
- 3
Check for data the company only licensed
Third-party datasets, open-source code and partner feeds come with their own terms. A failed company can't sell rights it never had.
- 4
Expect conditions and price them in
Buyer restrictions, consent requirements and deletion rights reduce what a buyer can do with the data. Factor them into the value range before anyone bids.
- 5
Get counsel who knows bankruptcy sales
Timelines in a case are set by the court, and objections can come from regulators you never spoke to. A specialist lawyer saves a deal more often than they slow it down.
Limits of this answer
This covers US federal bankruptcy law and two well-documented cases. It does not cover sales outside bankruptcy, assignments for the benefit of creditors, or other countries, where the GDPR and similar laws apply their own rules on transferring personal data. State privacy laws keep changing, and a policy's exact wording matters more than any general pattern described here.
Sources
| Source | What it supports | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| 11 U.S.C. §363, Cornell LII: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/363 | The rule on selling personally identifiable information | 2026-11-07 |
| 11 U.S.C. §332, Cornell LII: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/11/332 | How the consumer privacy ombudsman is appointed and what they report | 2026-11-07 |
| FTC press release, May 18, 2015: ftc.gov (RadioShack consumers' personal information) | The data at issue, the four recommended conditions and the Toysmart precedent | 2026-11-07 |
| GovInfoSecurity, July 2, 2025: govinfosecurity.com (court approves 23andMe sale to TTAM) | Buyer, the $305 million price, Regeneron's earlier $256 million deal and TTAM's commitments | 2026-11-07 |
| Minnesota Attorney General consumer alert, September 2025: ag.state.mn.us | Annual independent audits and the right to delete after the 23andMe sale | 2026-11-07 |
Questions people ask
Can a company sell my data if it goes bankrupt?
It can try, and often can. If its privacy policy promised not to transfer your personal information, the sale needs to fit that promise or be approved by the court after a consumer privacy ombudsman reviews it.
What is a consumer privacy ombudsman?
A neutral person appointed in a US bankruptcy case to advise the court on a proposed sale of personal information: the privacy policy, the likely harm and benefit to consumers, and alternatives that reduce the harm.
Does a buyer have to follow the old privacy policy?
Courts and regulators often require it. The FTC asked for exactly that in RadioShack, and the 23andMe buyer committed to honour the existing policies.
Can a bankrupt startup sell its codebase?
Generally yes, as ordinary estate property, as long as the company owns it and nothing in its licences, customer contracts or open-source components blocks the transfer. Personal data inside the code or its history should be removed first.
Related
- How to sell data your company holdsHow to sell data your business already holds, from listing what you have to signing the licence and handing it over safely.
- How to become a data brokerHow to become a data broker who brings company datasets to buyers: the skills, the legal checks, the documents and the order you do them in.
- Data broker blogThe data broker blog: one short, sourced article each weekday on how company data is found, valued, licensed and sold.
Become a data broker
The DataBroker course and tools: find companies with data to sell, price it, license it and close the deal.